[texhax] Math operators
barr at math.mcgill.ca
Fri Aug 7 14:26:36 CEST 2009
Let an author come to me with that claim and I will allow it. Mostly they
don't have a clue to what their doing and consistency with their other
papers (published where, that would allow, say Hom, to be in italics?). I
said, "more or less".
Anyway, I do get authors who say that don't like our theorem macros and
want to use their own and I say "no way". If we want to look like a
journal, we have to have some consistent formatting requirements. These
are totally relaxed for our reprint series that often uses scanned
versions of the original (and sometimes retyped versions, otherwise
recompiled versions if it machine readable).
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Victor Ivrii wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Michael Barr<barr at math.mcgill.ca> wrote:
>> The distinction above is the one I enforce (more or less) as TeX editor of
>> an online journal (Theory and Applications of Categories). It is purely
>> pragmatic, not based on any principle.
> I see a trouble with the principle "consistent notations for all
> articles in this journal" vs
> "consistent notations for all articles of this author"
More information about the texhax