[tex-live] bibtex apalike.tex/.sty
Reinhard Kotucha
reinhard.kotucha at web.de
Thu Oct 27 21:32:00 CEST 2016
On 2016-10-27 at 11:35:52 +0200, Siep Kroonenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:18:58PM +0200, texlive at schoepfer.info wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in the package bibtex, i think
> > apalike.tex and apalike.sty should move from docfiles -> runfiles
> >
> > While looking through the docs, here and there one finds .doc-files.
> > It feels a bit strange and pointless to me to use a another/proprietary
> > format for tex-documentation. Btw, only about 0.25% of all
> > documentation-files are .doc-files
> >
> > Johannes
>
> Long ago, emtex used the .doc extension for plain text
> documentation. This is at least the case with
> texmf-dist/doc/bibtex/germbib/apalike.doc.
$ cd texmd-dist/doc
$ find . -type f | wc -l
31622
find . -name "*.doc" | wc -l
91
$ find . -name "*.doc" -exec file {} \; | grep -i 'microsoft.*word' | wc -l
2
$ find . -name "*.doc" -exec file {} \; | grep -v text | grep -vi 'microsoft.*word'
./upmendex/upmendex.doc: LaTeX raw index file,
./latex/dccpaper/ijdc-v9.doc: LaTeX auxiliary file,
./latex/dccpaper/idcc.doc: LaTeX auxiliary file,
Only 2 out of 31622 files (0.0063247%) are M$-Word documents and
I suppose that the authors just forgot to convert them to PDF.
Regards,
Reinhard
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover mailto:reinhard.kotucha at web.de
------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the tex-live
mailing list