[tex-live] scheme modern

C.M. Connelly cmc at math.hmc.edu
Sat Jan 8 23:06:19 CET 2011


"PT" == Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk>

    PT> Martin Schröder wrote:

    >> And I have strong (religous) complains about any TeX
    >> distribution without the tex binary as defined by DEK. :-)

    PT> Did he define a binary, Martin ?  I thought he only
    PT> defined the source code.

To be called ``TeX'', an implementation has to pass a series of
tests (trip for TeX, trap for Metafont), which implies a
definition of a binary's functionality:

http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=triptrap

   Claire

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
  Claire M. Connelly                             cmc at math.hmc.edu
  System Administrator, Dept. of Mathematics, Harvey Mudd College
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/attachments/20110108/8ec627c2/attachment.bin>


More information about the tex-live mailing list