[tex-live] oversimplyfied test for lzmadec existence

Jukka Salmi j+tex-live at 2009.salmi.ch
Tue Aug 18 17:14:36 CEST 2009


Karl Berry --> tex-live (2009-01-18 12:48:40 -0600):
[...]
>     Maybe TL should support an additional "other" architecture: 
> 
> Sounds reasonable.  Would you like to make a patch for that?

Seems not to be needed anymore, i.e., tlmgr now seems to work fine with
an unsupported architecture.  Great!

The only annoying (IMHO) thing is that it now often prints

  TLPDB::setting: no available_architectures, returning empty list ...

to stderr while running.  What about turning such warning messages into
debug messages (see attached patch)?


Regards, Jukka

-- 
This email fills a much-needed gap in the archives.
-------------- next part --------------
Index: Master/tlpkg/TeXLive/TLPDB.pm
===================================================================
--- Master/tlpkg/TeXLive/TLPDB.pm	(revision 14745)
+++ Master/tlpkg/TeXLive/TLPDB.pm	(working copy)
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ sub setting_pkg {
     if (defined $ret) {
       @ret = split(" ", $ret);
     } else {
-      tlwarn "TLPDB::setting: no $key, returning empty list ...\n";
+      debug "TLPDB::setting: no $key, returning empty list ...\n";
       @ret = ();
     }
     return @ret;
@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ sub setting {
     if (defined $ret) {
       @ret = split(" ", $ret);
     } else {
-      tlwarn "TLPDB::setting: no $key, returning empty list ...\n";
+      debug "TLPDB::setting: no $key, returning empty list ...\n";
       @ret = ();
     }
     return @ret;


More information about the tex-live mailing list