[tex-live] texdoc should always use TEXDOCS
George N. White III
gnwiii at gmail.com
Fri Mar 16 17:30:59 CET 2007
On 3/16/07, Martin Schröder <martin at oneiros.de> wrote:
> 2007/3/16, Frank Küster <frank at kuesterei.ch>:
> > I don't know how fmtutil and these things work on windows, but I also
> > don't see how this is related to the question of maintaining Thomas'
> > tools in TeXlive. Either they do work for both now, then it's
> > irrelevant. Or they don't, then we should in the long run try to find a
> > unified way. But they still continue to be somewhat
> > distribution-specific.
> Most of Thomas' tools are shell scripts and as such don't work on
> Windows; the Windows versions usually are complete reimplementations
> in e.g. perl.
And may use very different underlying algorithms to get decent
fptex's shared memory kpathsea library implementation).
> LuaTeX will make this easier one day, as we will then have a lua
> interpreter on all plattforms.
Having some assurance of a common scripting language will certainly be
nice, but there will be pressure to include functionality in lua on
Windows that lua on linux can get from existing utilities.
There is a good chance that TeX on Windows will always lag behind the
*X implementations. People who need the latest stuff but are forced
to use Windows now have the option to run linux in a VM so perhaps in
the long run Windows doesn't really have to have everything that TeX
George N. White III <aa056 at chebucto.ns.ca>
Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia
More information about the tex-live