[tex-live] lcdf-typetools 2.46 and --enable-tetex-build

[Eddie Kohler]

Version 2.47 will have this patch!

The removal of ChangeLog was an oversight -- but my build system doesn't keep 
ChangeLog up to date anyway.

Eddie


Karl Berry wrote:
> Hi Eddie,
> 
> I hope you won't mind making the small changes below to the configure.in
> in lcdf-typetools.  Otherwise --enable-tetex-build doesn't know that
> opentype is available.  The AC_MSG_NOTICE just makes me feel better that
> I know which path is being executed.
> 
> (I've had some advice from the autoconf list about possible ways to
> avoid having to hardwire every kpse-related test when
> --enable-tetex-build.  Something to look into later.)
> 
> By the way, was the removal of the ChangeLog from the source
> distribution intentional?  Just curious.
> 
> Thanks,
> Karl
> 
> 
> --- lcdf-typetools-2.46/configure.in	2006-10-30 02:02:20.000000000 +0100
> +++ lcdf-typetools/configure.in	2006-11-26 02:42:43.000000000 +0100
> @@ -145,4 +145,5 @@
>  	CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I\$(top_builddir)/../../texk -I\$(top_srcdir)/../../texk"
>  	LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L\$(top_builddir)/../../texk/kpathsea/.libs"
> +        AC_MSG_NOTICE([tetex build of lcdf-typetools, CPPFLAGS now: $CPPFLAGS])
>      elif test "x$kpathsea" != x -a "x$kpathsea" != xyes; then
>  	CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I$kpathsea/include"
> @@ -198,5 +199,9 @@
>  
>      dnl does it have opentype support?
> -    AC_CHECK_DECLS(kpse_opentype_format, :, :, [#include <kpathsea/kpathsea.h>])
> +    if test "x$enable_tetex_build" = xyes; then
> +      AC_DEFINE(HAVE_DECL_KPSE_OPENTYPE_FORMAT)
> +    else
> +      AC_CHECK_DECLS(kpse_opentype_format, :, :, [#include <kpathsea/kpathsea.h>])
> +    fi
>  fi
>  AC_SUBST([KPSEINTERFACE_O])