[tex-k] Incompatibility between WEB and C versions of "ovp2ovf"
igor.liferenko at gmail.com
Mon Mar 14 14:34:53 CET 2016
Thank you for the response.
> Probably (MAP ...) part is not necessary in the case where character code is not remapped.
If we consider the behavior of "vptovf" as standard, then "ovp2ovf" is
incorrect, because it behaves differently:
echo "(MAPFONT D 0 (FONTNAME cmr10))" > myfont.vpl
tftopl cmr10 >> myfont.vpl
then check that (MAP ...) part was added:
In my previous email there was a small mistake. The following example
is more correct:
echo "(MAPFONT D 0 (FONTNAME cmr10))" > myfont.ovp
tftopl cmr10 >> myfont.ovp
ovp2ovf myfont.ovp myfont.ovf myfont.ofm
wovp2ovf myfont.ovp webfont.ovf webfont.ofm
More information about the tex-k