[tex-k] Autoconf-2.13 vs. 2.59

Karl Berry karl at freefriends.org
Sun Jan 30 18:41:53 CET 2005


    possibility to have several independently maintained makefile
    fragments is certainly very convenient.

True enough.  One way or another, I don't think we want to give that up.

Along these lines, let me mention that Taco would like the same thing
for MetaPost.  Olaf, please see attached metapost.mk and revised
Makefile.in (which ac_include's the new metapost.mk).  Can you install
this (or is it ok if I do)?  It'll make Taco's development builds of
mp that much easier.

Thanks,
karl

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: metapost.mk
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5073 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-k/attachments/20050130/c236597b/metapost-0001.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Makefile.in
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 40282 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-k/attachments/20050130/c236597b/Makefile-0001.obj


More information about the tex-k mailing list