[tex-k] Re: dvips documentation is old [with patch]
karl at freefriends.org
Fri May 28 15:24:40 CEST 2004
only a reference to the documentation of those [EPSF]
packages kept in the dvips documentation.
The difference is that epsf.sty has no other documentation.
What's in the dvips manual is it.
Anyway, it's not important. As I said, I see no harm in mentioning
\includegraphics, since you went to the trouble of writing it. I agree
that only mentioning epsf is rather misleading.
More information about the tex-k