[tex-k] [firstname.lastname@example.org: RHN Errata Alert: Command
execution vulnerability in dvips]
Sat, 02 Nov 2002 14:33:49 +0100
Reinhard Kotucha <email@example.com> writes:
> In my opinion, the best way to go is to put dvips under the LPPL.
> Then dvips would be dvips and RedHat has to distribute it under
> another name, i.e. "dvips_broken_by_RedHat".
And you'll get xdvi_broken_by_RedHat and
It's up to Red Hat to change the software in the way they think their
users will like it best. It's up to the user to choose a distribution
that makes the choices that she likes best.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <firstname.lastname@example.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org