[metapost] generic TeX interface?
mailing_list at arcor.de
Tue Dec 12 13:55:44 CET 2006
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
>> Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
>>>Stephan Hennig wrote:
>>>* The 4096 limit will go away when we switch to 64-bit calculus
>>> (planned for 1.1)
>> What will be the new limit? (With ten fingers and two digits in mind I
> Most likely is 2^28 (268.435.456 in decimal)
Currently, when it comes to calculating areas, 181 is the largest number
that can be squared (with 15 digits intermediate precision).
n := 182;
s := (n**2)/16;
show n, s;
This situation occurs when trying to keep differently shaped figures
equally sized wrt to their area. Since 181 bp = 2.5 in = 6.3 cm that's
not impressive. I'm currently working around that limit by scaling.
With an assumed intermediate precision of 2^31 the limit raises to 46340
bp = 643 in = 1634 cm. Quite acceptable. :)
More information about the metapost