[OS X TeX] 64 Bit Binaries for TeX Live 2009
Jonathan Kew
jonathan at jfkew.plus.com
Tue Nov 24 23:34:43 CET 2009
On 24 Nov 2009, at 21:55, Richard Koch wrote:
> Konrad,
>
> I'm the guy who made BasicTeX. I flat out don't believe the binaries
> are faster in BasicTeX for a rather simple reason: they are exactly
> the same binaries.
Yes, the binaries are identical. But what about the formats -- in
particular, does BasicTeX have the full collection of hyphenation
languages, or is it English-only? That could make a significant
difference to engine startup time. And the smaller ls-R files would
load faster during kpathsearch initialization.
So I think it's logical that there'd be a (slight, and fairly constant
regardless of document length) difference.
JK
-------------- next part --------------
----------- Please Consult the Following Before Posting -----------
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Reminders and Etiquette: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
TeX on Mac OS X Website: http://mactex-wiki.tug.org/
List Info: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list