[Fontinst] PSNFSS for URW fonts?
ud at art-satz.de
Mon Mar 24 18:00:12 CET 2003
Walter Schmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:48:35 +0100, Ulrich Dirr wrote:
>>> The Times fonts (the real ones) come also with AR3, and
>>> Courier, Symbol and ZapfDingbats are still provided with
>>> newer AR versions. However, they have no advantage over
>>> URW's clones, which are indistinguishable.
>> But you know that there're different versions nevertheless. From
>> v1.006 to v1.007 (the well-known shape of the 'z' in italic) but
>> also changes to v2.000 (compare, e.g., kern pairs 283 vs 1038 in
> You mean the Adobe Times fonts? Well, the AR3 distributions include
> version 1.007, and that's exactly what the present PSNFSS refers to.
> I.e., the TFMs and VFS are based on version 1.007 of the AFM files.
> You may run into trouble, when you actually _purchase_ the Times
> fonts and get version 2.000.
Yes, the Adobe fonts.
> We have the same Preoblem with Palatino: The version you can
> _purchase_ from Adobe (2.000) is clearly different from the
> classical PostScript base font (1.05), despite the same FontName.
That's not so obvious to me---as Adobe called them the new base fonts
(and they are probably going into RIPs with original Adobe Postscript).
> That's why a new PSNFSS should be based upon the URW fonts. They
> must always be embedded, so you can make sure to embed the version
> that matches the TeX font metrics. I expect to make a test release
> available in 6 weeks or so.
I agree that all font should be embedded.
More information about the fontinst