Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:12:37 +0100
At 15.23 +0100 2003-01-12, Philipp Lehman wrote:
>On Sunday 12 January 2003 14:54, you wrote:
>> No. It got further than before, but it stopped at
>> It doesn't seem to recognise `apple'
>Right. 'apple' is the only glyph that was omitted when updating 8r.
>The rationale was that as a logo it doesn't have any business in a
>text encoding (and 8r was saturated anyway).
>Solving this is tricky because you'd need to modify 8r again. But that
>will affect the whole chain of tools from fontinst to dvips and
>I'm CC'ing the list. Maybe Lars has a better idea...
Well, _if_ there (according to the AFM) are no unencoded glyphs in the font
to begin with, then you can just skip reencoding. Instead of e.g.
at that later point.