[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fontinst 1.801 -- still worse
**** On Tue, 8 Jun 1999 22:03:04 +0100 (BST), "Sebastian Rahtz" <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> Apparently so far only the people who developed the fontinst
> stuff were using it seriously, and they already know all the
> details, which are _not_ explained in the documentation ;-)
SR> evidence to the contrary is Alan Hoenig, who does not really class as a
SR> fontinst developer, but who certainly understands it
SR> but i concede there may be some truth in your remark...
Well, I use fontinst, and I wouldn't dream of getting involved in
development... It *is* unfortunate that so many of the details are omitted
from the documentation, but I've managed to use fontinst to set up several
of my Type 1 font families for use with TeX.
Fernando Q. Gouvea
Department of Mathematics Editor, MAA Online
Colby College http://www.maa.org
Important Latin Phrases: Furnulum pani nolo.
(I don't want a toaster.)