[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801

To: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>, "tex-fonts" <tex-fonts@math.utah.edu>
Subject: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
From: "Walter Schmidt" <walter.schmidt@arcormail.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 17:53:42 +0200 (MSZ)
Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "Walter Schmidt" <walter.schmidt@arcormail.de>

Hi,

just some additions to what I wrote yesterday:

As to the tfm's for the 8r encoding, I have clearly found out, 
that fontinst 1.801 produces tfm's which differ from those found 
on CTAN (lw35nfss.zip), which were, AFAIK, made using v1.800.

What's wrong here?

(As to the 8a encoded fonts, I wrote nonsense:  There are no 
tfm's for 8a in lw35nfss.zip.  Sorry!)

TIA

Walter

PS:  I had some email problems from sunday until now.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
  - From: "Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: sorry about the message
Next by Date: fontinst 1.801 -- still worse
Prev by thread: Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
Next by thread: Re: fontinst 1.800 vs 1.801
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread