[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fontname codes for variants (was: fontname code for scaled variant)
Karl Berry writes:
> I'm afraid I don't understand.
I was posing a new question, namely whether there is any variant code
for superior/inferior. Up to this point, I've privately been using 1
and 0 respectively for these variants.
If there is no current standard, I'd like to propose that the above
scheme be adopted as the standard.
> Or we could just forget the whole thing :-).
Well, we should certainly forget about the scaled variants -- I had
forgotten the power of NFSS. Thanks to Thierry Bouche for putting me