[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: bkph@ai.mit.edu*Subject*: Re: MF ==> (PS type1)*From*: Frank Jensen <fj@cs.auc.dk>*Date*: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 18:18:01 +0100 (MET)*CC*: pflynn@curia.ucc.ie, metafont@ens.fr, tex-fonts@math.utah.edu*Flags*: 000000000000*In-reply-to*: <199703111700.MAA13462@kauai.ai.mit.edu> (bkph@ai.mit.edu)

bkph> This is in direct contradiction to the information given at the BSR bkph> and Y&Y web sites. So what is the truth? bkph> bkph> Could you explain? I do not know what the contradiction is? bkph> bkph> Yes, the AMS font set exists in Type 1 format. Yes, it includes Euler bkph> fonts. But you use it *with* CM fonts for basic math, it just bkph> *extends* it. I must have somehow missed the point.... The Euler family also contains EURM and EUSB fonts. The EURM fonts may replace CMMI and the EUSB fonts may replace the CMSY fonts (at least partially). This is what Knuth did for the Concrete Mathematics book. Look at the `gkpmac.tex' macro package (builds on the plain format). I did a similar package (`euler') for LaTeX. --- Frank Jensen, fj@cs.auc.dk Department of Computer Science Aalborg University DENMARK

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)***From:*"Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

**References**:**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)***From:*"Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)** - Next by Date:
**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)** - Prev by thread:
**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)** - Next by thread:
**Re: MF ==> (PS type1)** - Index(es):