[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
> I don't think, that support for esperanto is a purely academic thing: There
> is an active book production in esperanto which needs either a ready-made
> \^\j or the \j itself.
i didnt mean Esperanto is academic; but it is mildly obscure. why not
just use a font which has dotlessj, if you need it?
> Furthermore, I think, that TeXtures and Y&Y don't have the right to block a
> possible progress. It can be done with dvips, and it should be done. I am
i dont entirely agree. solutions should not depend on idiosyncracies
of one driver
> pretty sure, that the commercial TeX vendors will incorporate support for
> the dotless j, as soon as their customers demand it.
the problem is not the TeX vendors, but the font vendors. if a font
has dotless j, it'll be used. The Lucida fonts have it, for instance.